youngka.newsvine.com - OregonGirl-1005496

Latest Comments

If going through airport security you were selected for secondary screening, which method would you prefer?
Wed Apr 1, 2009
- I am a 65 year old woman. They damn well better have "probabale cause" to use this scan or I will volunteer myself to the ACLU and take it to the supreme court, if necessary. We have a RIGHT to some privacy...at least the last time I checked the Constitution!!

Recent Votes

OregonGirl-1005496 has not voted for any articles yet.

Comments & Feedback

What Constitution did you check last time? In fact the US Constitution does not have a right to privacy, although I think some state constitutions do.

Also, probable cause isn't necessary to require you to get a pat-down, which is also quite intrusive. You have the option to refuse both: don't fly. Most people weigh the choice and decide the security screening isn't really a big cost to pay for the benefit of quick air travel. But because of the rights that *are* in the US Constitution, you can make that choice for yourself and travel some other way.
— Doug2